children playing

German childcare plan sparks debate on stay-at-home mums

Printer-friendly versionSend by emailPDF version
Author: 
Lentze, Georg
Format: 
Article
Publication Date: 
7 Nov 2012

 

EXCERPTS:

Is it a "stay-at-home premium" that will stop mothers from looking for work, or is it fair compensation for parents who choose to look after their young children without the state's help?

The German government's plan for a childcare allowance payable to parents who do not use state-subsidised nurseries has sparked fierce debate.

Recently Chancellor Angela Merkel's centre-right coalition reached agreement on the measure, under which eligible parents of infants aged between 13 and 36 months would receive 150 euros (£120) a month.
'Kinder, Kueche, Kirche'?

The plan has been pushed through by Mrs Merkel's conservative Bavarian Christian Social Union allies against critics in the coalition's own ranks.

And the opposition Social Democrats (SPD) have threatened to lodge a complaint with the constitutional court to stop it.

Sunday's agreement has not silenced everybody in the governing camp. Cornelia Pieper, a leading member of the pro-business Liberals (FDP), says money allocated to the measure should instead be ploughed into formal education. The childcare allowance is "a return to the old concept of the family based on Kinder, Kueche, Kirche (children, kitchen, church)", Ms Pieper, minister of state at the foreign ministry, told the regional daily Mitteldeutsche Zeitung.

Others have rejected this argument, pointing out that parents who receive the allowance can still both go to work if they make other childcare arrangements, such as relying on relatives or privately-run nurseries.

That is why the "stay-at-home premium" label
used by critics of the scheme is "deeply wrong", Georg Meck said in the
right-leaning Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung daily.

However, now that the measure has been agreed, a commentary
by Berthold Kohler in the same paper concedes that supporters of the
traditional family model have been put "on the defensive" by this
debate.

Among those leading the attack on the measure is the popular
women's magazine Brigitte. It carried a commentary by Julia Karnick
arguing that it does not make any sense to reward parents for choosing
not to take up a service offered to them by the state. "It stuns me when
politicians keep doing the opposite of what has to be done," Ms Karnick
says.

Picking up on the fact that the allowance has been championed
by a Bavarian party, Nadja Erb in the Berliner Zeitung says that
"outside Bavaria practically nobody believes that it is a good idea".
The paper says that this is why it is unlikely to stay in place after
the September 2013 parliamentary election.


'Hausfrau' debate

Against the backdrop of the childcare controversy, the current
edition of the weekly Die Zeit runs a series of articles on whether it
is still acceptable to be a stay-at-home mother in modern-day Germany.

One article makes the case for the choice of being a
"Hausfrau". Sabine Rueckert says a "self-aware housewife" is a "rebel
against the constraints of the market".

"She does not take part in the big rat race. She is not
always mobile and contactable. She sits by the sandpit and watches her
toddlers shovel. She has what children need to grow up: time."

Ms Rueckert acknowledges that
"being a housewife is not necessarily good fun" because "her work is not
valued". Nevertheless, housewives quietly "hold things together and
provide an atmosphere which is good to come home to".

Another article argues that for a mother to stay at home
indefinitely is not fair on the father, who finds himself condemned to
be the sole breadwinner in uncertain economic times. Christoph Droesser
says such men miss out on valuable family time.

"A woman who expects me to provide for her and our children
'until death do us part' puts a burden on my shoulders of which even the
strongest can no longer say today whether they can bear it, even if
they want to," he adds.

An article in Die Zeit's magazine supplement makes a
different point: choosing to give up one's career to stay at home with
the children can result in poverty if the breadwinner ends the
relationship. Julia Friedrichs, whose article is about a mother who
faces this predicament, says the possibility of resuming work and
sharing childcare with her partner had not even entered the woman's
mind.

"Contrary to Scandinavia and France, where the state sponsors
childcare, or Britain, where many women have no choice but to take up
work again soon, Germany is still a conservative country in which the
state chiefly supports the mother who stays at home rather than
childcare facilities," she says.

-reprinted from BBC News

Region: