Is this as good as it gets? Child care as a test case for assessing
the Social Union Framework Agreement
Martha Friendly
Childcare Resource and Research Unit, 2002.
Martha Friendly examines how child care has fared for three years under
the Social Union Framework Agreement. This article appeared in the Canadian
Journal of Social Policy (2001) Issue 47, p 77-82.
EXCERPT
Released on International Women's Day in 1986, Status of Women Canada's
groundbreaking Report of the Task Force on Child Care, was greeted enthusiastically
by feminist groups and non-governmental organizations. The Task Force's
key recommendation was a universal system of child care - co-funded by
federal and provincial governments with affordable parent fees, designed
and managed by the provinces under national standards - to serve all children
and families by 2001. At the time, such a child care program seemed not
only reasonable, intelligent and necessary but also possible.
However, recurrent political commitments and exponential growth in research
providing rationales for universal child care and early education have
not produced the publicly-funded, high quality system of services the
Task Force envisioned. Indeed, the shifts in roles and responsibilities
that culminated in the 1999 Social Union Framework Agreement (SUFA) have
shaped a political environment in which it seems less possible to achieve
a child care system now than it did then. Although the stalemate in public
policy extends considerably beyond child care to health, housing and other
areas, child care as an essential but not established social program is
a good test case for assessing the agreement. As SUFA's three-year trial
nears its close, an appraisal of how well child care has fared in the
new regime is timely.
|
PDF files require Adobe Acrobat Reader.
Get Acrobat Reader.
|