 |
Aboriginal
early child care and education |
ABOR |

|
Canadas
Aboriginal populations include First Nations and non-status native
people (on- and off-reserve), Métis and Inuit. Although many Aboriginal
people live in remote and/or northern areas, there are large southern,
urban populations as well.
| Children
0-14 years identifying with an aboriginal group, Canada (1996) |
| |
North
American Indian |
Métis |
Inuit |
| 0-4
yrs |
106,370 |
25,800 |
7,325 |
| 5-9
yrs |
101,415 |
24,220 |
7,025 |
| 10-14
yrs |
91,880 |
22,605 |
5,560 |
|
|
Issues |
|
| |
Flexibility/accessibility
All Aboriginal groups have child populations which are larger than
the national average, making child care an especially important issue.
However, Aboriginal children are under-represented in current child care
services. There is a particular need for a wide range of flexible
services that will accommodate the diverse needs of the Aboriginal
community.
Cultural integrity The maintenance of
indigenous culture is a major concern for all Aboriginal peoples.
Aboriginal organizations point out that general standards for child care
centres are sometimes too rigid for northern and/or remote com-munities
and that they may not reflect traditional cultural norms and practices.
Culturally sensitive early childhood education, as it pertains to
training and service delivery, is of special concern. There is a strong
interest among aboriginal groups in developing child care that is
operated and controlled by the communities themselves.
|
|
Government
Policy |
|
|
Generally,
on-reserve social programs depend upon the federal government for
funding. Canadian government policy pertaining to child care/early
childhood education for Aboriginal people is, like Canadian early
childhood policy generally, fragmented and poorly developed. However,
there have been some significant advances in Aboriginal early childhood
services in the 1990s.
Although regulation of on-reserve Aboriginal child care is, in some
provinces, carried out by provincial governments, other on-reserve
provincial governments have not regulated it. In some provinces, First
Nations communities do not recognize provincial jurisdiction on
reserves. In the past, child care funding was limited to First Nations
in the Yukon and Northwest Territories, in Ontario and Alberta where the
Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development (DIAND) covered
costs in accordance with provincial funding policies, and Québec where
child care programs for First Nations children received federal funding
through the James Bay Northern Québec Agreement. Until 1995, when the
First Nations Inuit Child Care Initiative was announced, there was
relatively little spending for Aboriginal child care in much of Canada.
In 1996 the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples recommended
that
"federal,
provincial, and territorial governments co-operate to support an
integrated early childhood funding strategy that a) extends early
childhood education to all Aboriginal children regardless of
residence; b) encourages programs that foster the physical, social,
intellectual and spiritual development of children, reducing
distinctions between child care, prevention and education; c)
maximizes Aboriginal control over service design and administration;
d) offers one-stop accessible funding; and e) promotes parental
involvement and choice in early childhood education options.
"
|
|
Initiatives
in the 1990s |
|
| |
Aboriginal child care through
Indian Affairs and Northern Development Spending
over the 1990s on Aboriginal child care through the Indian and Northern
Development department is
estimated at: $15 million in 1994-95; $17 million in 1995-96; $18
million in 1996-9; and $18 million in 1997-98.
In addition, there have been two new federal initiatives relevant to
Aboriginal early childhood development services.
Aboriginal Head Start Aboriginal Head Start, a
Health Canada program, is a federally-funded early intervention strategy
to provide comprehensive experiences for Indian, Métis and Inuit
children and their families
based on caring, creativity and pride
flowing from the knowledge of their traditional beliefs within a
holistic and safe environment". Originally, it focused on
Aboriginal children in urban centres and northern communities but it was
extended to on-reserve communities in 1998. Its goal is to support early
childhood development strategies designed and controlled by Aboriginal
people. An estimated $62 million is to be spent on Aboriginal Head Start
between 1994 and 1998. In 1998 there were more than 90 Aboriginal Head
Start projects across the country.
Funding for the on-reserve Aboriginal Head Start program has been set at
$100 million over four years beginning with $15 million in 1998/99. When
off-reserve Aboriginal Head Start was announced in 1995, funding for a 4
year period totaled $83.7 million: $25.7 million for 1995-96; $23
million for 1996-97; $22.5 million in each of 1997-98 and 1998-99.
First Nations/Inuit Child Care Initiative The
First Nations/Inuit Child Care Initiative, a Human Resources Development
Canada program, was announced in 1995. It is intended to achieve levels
of quality and quantity of child care in First Nations and Inuit
communities that are comparable to those available to the general
population. The 3 year initiative, 100% federally funded, was to develop
and upgrade child care spaces with a target of 6,000 spaces intended to
meet the accessibility level of the general population.
First Nations and Inuit organizations have assumed the responsibility
for administration of funds and for developing regulated child care
services and related support programs like family resource centres.
Funding for the First Nations/Inuit Child Care Initiative is not
intended to replace existing funding programs under DIAND.
The First Nations/Inuit Child Care
Initiative funding was part of the $720 committed to child care in the
1993 election campaign but, except for the First Nations/Inuit
Initiative, not spent. The First Nations/Inuit Child Care Initiative had
a financial commitment of $6 million for 1995-96; $26 million for
1996/97; and $40 million for 1997-98. On-going funding of $36 million
annually will be available after this 3 year period.
|
|